AI visibility, measured against your own baseline.
When a buyer asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI Overview who to hire, some brand gets named. This line is the work of becoming that brand: measured across six engines first, then fixed in the order that moves the number.
AI visibility is how often your brand gets named, cited, and linked when someone asks an AI engine what to buy, who to hire, or which tool to use. It is measurable, and we measure it before we sell anything against it. The line runs a frozen set of buyer-intent questions for your category across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Grok, scores every answer with our own versioned parser, and gives you a Share of Answer baseline you can open and check yourself. The work that follows is specific and unglamorous: crawler access, schema and entity architecture, answer-first page structure, freshness, and the third-party citations that put your domain in the source set engines quote from. We never promise a citation or a ranking, because nobody honestly can. We promise movement against your own baseline, on a published calendar, with the numbers visible the whole way.
What runs on this line
Every engagement opens with the audit, because we will not quote retainer work against a number nobody has measured yet.
Start with the number, not the pitch
One frozen question set, six engines, your Share of Answer next to three to five competitors, and the 90-day plan to move it. Five business days, $999, credited to month one if we work together.
Questions about AI visibility
Can you guarantee we show up in ChatGPT?
No, and nobody honestly can: AI answers are probabilistic and shift with model updates. What we guarantee is progress against your own numbers, and it counts any of three ways: your Share of Answer moves over your frozen baseline, your search visibility on the keyword set we froze together moves (that one moves first, because AI engines read the same authority and content signals search does), or your AI-referred and organic-sourced leads move. Whichever way it shows up, it has to clear your own measured noise floor inside your guarantee window, 90 or 120 days as set by the audit's authority read. Separately, every deliverable ships on the published calendar or that month is free. If no progress test clears its floor, we keep working free for up to two more delivery months, and if it still has not moved, either of us can end the engagement.
How is this different from a $99 AI visibility tool?
The tool measures; it cannot fix. It will tell you that you are invisible to AI and then leave the schema, the rewrites, the citations, and the PR to a team you may not have. The predictable result is a subscription that reports the same gap every month while nothing on the site changes. We run the whole execution loop and take responsibility for the outcome. If a $99 tool genuinely is enough for you, our audit will say so and decline the retainer.
We already track this with an AI visibility tool. Why do we need you?
Keep the tool. It is a scoreboard and a useful independent check on our numbers, and we will read it next to ours. What it cannot tell you is which sections of which pages to reshape, in what order, or who ships them, so it reports the same gap next quarter unless somebody acts on it. Measuring is not the work. The work is rebuilding your pages so that each section stands alone as a quotable answer, because engines retrieve sections rather than whole pages, and then earning the third-party citations that back them. That is the part we own.
How fast does AI visibility move?
In the order the work actually moves. Foundation fixes (crawler access, schema, entity work) go live within days of onboarding, with no dependence on your dev queue. Your marketing pages then move onto our hosting in waves, highest-value first. Leading indicators, meaning search impressions on your frozen keyword set, move in weeks. Share of Answer follows across your guarantee window, 90 or 120 days as set by the audit's authority read, because AI engines lag the same signals search visibility reflects. The honest frame: this is an owned asset that compounds over quarters, not a campaign that spikes over a weekend.
Does this replace our SEO?
No, it shares a spine with it. The same authority, content structure, and technical signals feed both surfaces, which is why one audit opens both lines and both run against one frozen baseline. If your organic foundation is weak, GEO work on top of it is marginal, and the audit will tell you that plainly rather than sell you the more fashionable half.